William D. Wilson, Sr. v. American Builders & Contractors Supply Company, Inc. D/B/A ABC Supply Company, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 9, 2012
Docket01-12-00537-CV
StatusPublished

This text of William D. Wilson, Sr. v. American Builders & Contractors Supply Company, Inc. D/B/A ABC Supply Company, Inc. (William D. Wilson, Sr. v. American Builders & Contractors Supply Company, Inc. D/B/A ABC Supply Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William D. Wilson, Sr. v. American Builders & Contractors Supply Company, Inc. D/B/A ABC Supply Company, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Opinion issued August 9, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00537-CV ——————————— WILLIAM D. WILSON, SR., Appellant V. AMERICAN BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. D/B/A ABC SUPPLY CO., INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 967030

MEMORANDUM OPINION

William D. Wilson, Sr. brought this restricted appeal from a post-answer

default judgment rendered in favor of appellee American Builders & Contractors Supply Company, Inc. d/b/a ABC Supply Co., Inc. (“ABC Supply”). To prevail

on a restricted appeal, the appellant must show: (1) he filed notice of the restricted

appeal within six months after the judgment was signed; (2) he was a party to the

underlying lawsuit; (3) he did not participate in the hearing that resulted in the

judgment complained of and did not timely file any postjudgment motions or

requests for findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (4) error is apparent on the

face of the record. Ins. Co. of Pa. v. Lejeune, 297 S.W.3d 254, 255 (Tex. 2009)

(per curiam); Alexander v. Lynda’s Boutique, 134 S.W.3d 845, 848 (Tex. 2004);

see also TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(c), 30.

The parties have not yet filed briefs in this case, but they have submitted an

“Agreed Motion to Set Aside the Judgment and Remand for New Trial.”

According to the agreed statement of the procedural history of this case and this

Court’s review of the record, all four requirements for relief via a restricted appeal

have been met: (1) Wilson filed a notice of appeal within six months after the date

the trial court signed the default judgment; (2) Wilson was a party to the

underlying lawsuit; (3) Wilson did not participate in the hearing on ABC Supply’s

motion for default judgment, which was the dispositive trial setting in this case;

and (4) error is apparent on the face of the record because the trial court rendered a

default judgment in favor of ABC Supply without notice of the motion for default

judgment or notice of the hearing on the motion for default judgment being given

2 to Wilson.1 See Peralta v. Heights Med. Ctr., Inc., 485 U.S. 80, 84, 108 S. Ct. 896,

899 (1988) (stating that failure to give notice of proceeding that will be accorded

finality is violation of due process); Mabon Ltd. v. Afri-Carib Enters., Inc., No. 09-

0715, 2012 WL 539385, at *4 (Tex. Feb. 17, 2012) (per curiam) (“Entry of a post-

answer default judgment against a defendant who did not receive notice of the trial

setting or dispositive hearing constitutes a denial of due process under the

Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”); see also LBL Oil Co.

v. Int’l Power Servs., Inc., 777 S.W.2d 390, 390–91 (Tex. 1989) (per curiam)

(holding same in writ of error context); Yuen v. Fisher, 227 S.W.3d 193, 199 (Tex.

App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.) (“Because the record establishes that

Fisher had no actual or constructive notice of the default judgment hearing, we

conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in setting aside the default

judgment.”).

1 Although ABC Supply’s motion for default judgment contains a certificate of service, this certificate states that the motion was mailed to “William E. Wilson” at an address in Lorena, Texas. ABC Supply’s first amended petition, the citation for this petition, and the “Certificate of Last Known Address for Defendant William D. Wilson, Sr.” all list Wilson’s mailing address as an address in China Springs, Texas. The record does not contain a notice of hearing relating to ABC Supply’s motion for default judgment. 3 We therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this cause

for further proceedings. All pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.
485 U.S. 80 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania v. Lejeune
297 S.W.3d 254 (Texas Supreme Court, 2009)
LBL Oil Co. v. International Power Services, Inc.
777 S.W.2d 390 (Texas Supreme Court, 1989)
Xenos Yuen v. Fisher
227 S.W.3d 193 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Mabon Ltd. v. Afri-Carib Enterprises, Inc.
369 S.W.3d 809 (Texas Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
William D. Wilson, Sr. v. American Builders & Contractors Supply Company, Inc. D/B/A ABC Supply Company, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-d-wilson-sr-v-american-builders-contractor-texapp-2012.