William D. Messamore v. United States

Sixth Circuit

William D. Messamore v. United States

209 F.2d 258, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3153

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 9, 1953·No. 11902_1·Published

Opinion

*259 PER CURIAM.

Appellant, who was convicted by jury verdict of bank robbery and sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment, charges that he has been deprived of his constitutional rights guaranteed under the Sixth Amendment, in that the attorney selected and employed by him failed to represent him faithfully. Appellant does not charge that the attorney did not adequately represent him during the trial, but insists that, after conviction of appellant, the attorney was delinquent in respect to appealing the case.

We do not find the charge justified upon the record; and, accordingly, the order of the district court denying the motion of appellant to vacate the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*259 PER CURIAM.

Appellant, who was convicted by jury verdict of bank robbery and sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment, charges that he has been deprived of his constitutional rights guaranteed under the Sixth Amendment, in that the attorney selected and employed by him failed to represent him faithfully. Appellant does not charge that the attorney did not adequately represent him during the trial, but insists that, after conviction of appellant, the attorney was delinquent in respect to appealing the case.

We do not find the charge justified upon the record; and, accordingly, the order of the district court denying the motion of appellant to vacate the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

William D. Messamore v. United States, 209 F.2d 258, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3153 (6th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

209 F.2d 258 (William D. Messamore v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.