William Commedore v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary

416 F.2d 20, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10782
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 16, 1969·No. 23829·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus. Commedore is an Oregon state prisoner, serving a 19-year sentence imposed under the Oregon Habitual Criminal Act, ORS 168.085(3). He was found to have committed three prior felonies. He attacked the validity of one of these on two grounds. First, he says that because his sentence was to jail rather than to state penitentiary, his conviction was of a misdemeanor. This point has been decided against him by the Supreme Court of Oregon. State v. Commedore, 1964, 239 Or. 82, 396 P.2d 216. He also claimed that he pled guilty *21 in the prior case because he was led to believe that he would be found guilty-only of a misdemeanor. On this issue the federal court held a hearing at which appellant testified. The court did not believe him, and found against him on the facts; that finding is sustained by the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Commedore v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary, 416 F.2d 20, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10782 (9th Cir. 1969).

416 F.2d 20 (William Commedore v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Commedore
396 P.2d 216 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1964)