William Cogburn and Rothe J. Carle v. Clyde Haak
This text of William Cogburn and Rothe J. Carle v. Clyde Haak (William Cogburn and Rothe J. Carle v. Clyde Haak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-12-00447-CV
William Cogburn and Rothe J. Carle, Appellants
v.
Clyde Haak, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-12-000227, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants have filed an unopposed motion asking to be allowed to withdraw their
appeal, explaining that they have settled their dispute. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Henson
Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion
Filed: December 4, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William Cogburn and Rothe J. Carle v. Clyde Haak, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-cogburn-and-rothe-j-carle-v-clyde-haak-texapp-2012.