William Clinton Gardner v. United States

Ninth Circuit

William Clinton Gardner v. United States

415 F.2d 1139

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 3, 1969

Docket22888

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 415 F.2d 1139 (William Clinton Gardner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Clinton Gardner v. United States, 415 F.2d 1139 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The point on the method of search and seizure under a search warrant was not made before trial as required by Rule 41 (e) Fed.R.Crim.P. Late in the trial an issue of probable cause was tendered on the search warrant. Thus, the Government was not obligated to meet a challenge that was never made, i. e., method.

There were convictions on five counts. The sentences were wholly concurrent. On count, four, we find the case close on sufficiency of the evidence, but while we are authorized to consider the point, we still need not do it.

There was sufficient circumstantial and direct evidence to sustain the convictions on four counts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI