William Clayton Ingram v. D. J. McCarthy Superintendent, California Men's Colony San Luis Obispo, California

470 F.2d 986
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 1972
Docket72-2361
StatusPublished

This text of 470 F.2d 986 (William Clayton Ingram v. D. J. McCarthy Superintendent, California Men's Colony San Luis Obispo, California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Clayton Ingram v. D. J. McCarthy Superintendent, California Men's Colony San Luis Obispo, California, 470 F.2d 986 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is taken from order of the District Court denying relief in habeas corpus.

The District Court determined that appellant’s claims (concerning his request of counsel that an appeal be taken from his state court judgment and counsel’s failure to comply with that request) have been resolved in full and fair evidentiary hearings in the state courts. We find no abuse of discretion in the District Court’s acceptance of the state findings.

The District Court also held that as to any claim for relief that appellant may have by virtue of his lack of knowledge of the specifics of his state right of appeal, appellant has failed to exhaust state remedies. We agree. The California state courts should have an opportunity to rule on appellant’s claim in the light of People v. Acosta, 71 Cal.2d 683, 78 Cal.Rptr. 864, 456 P.2d 136 (1969).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Acosta
456 P.2d 136 (California Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
470 F.2d 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-clayton-ingram-v-d-j-mccarthy-superintendent-california-mens-ca9-1972.