William Citrano v. Binion Land & Cattle Company., Inc. Margaret Citrano, Individually And Herbert Alvin Binion, Individually

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 25, 2006
Docket13-06-00225-CV
StatusPublished

This text of William Citrano v. Binion Land & Cattle Company., Inc. Margaret Citrano, Individually And Herbert Alvin Binion, Individually (William Citrano v. Binion Land & Cattle Company., Inc. Margaret Citrano, Individually And Herbert Alvin Binion, Individually) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Citrano v. Binion Land & Cattle Company., Inc. Margaret Citrano, Individually And Herbert Alvin Binion, Individually, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

                                            NUMBER 13-06-225-CV

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

                            THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                              CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________

WILLIAM CITRANO,                                                                               Appellant,

                                                             v.

BINION LAND & CATTLE COMPANY, INC., ET AL.,                                  Appellees.

                               On appeal from the 146th District Court

                                              of Bell County, Texas.

                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                       Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, WILLIAM CITRANO, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 146th District Court of Bell County, Texas, in cause number 197,064-B.  After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.  In the motion, appellant states that he no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 25th day of May, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
William Citrano v. Binion Land & Cattle Company., Inc. Margaret Citrano, Individually And Herbert Alvin Binion, Individually, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-citrano-v-binion-land-cattle-company-inc-m-texapp-2006.