William Chaklos v. St John Providence
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 2, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
161641 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh
WILLIAM D. CHAKLOS and CATHY Elizabeth M. Welch, CHAKLOS, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v SC: 161641 COA: 352735 Oakland CC: 2018-170293-NH ST. JOHN PROVIDENCE, d/b/a ST. JOHN PROVIDENCE HEALTH, and d/b/a ST. JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM, ASCENSION HEALTH, SUSAN A. IVANOVIC, M.D., and INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS, PC, Defendants,
and PROVIDENCE-PROVIDENCE PARK HOSPITAL, d/b/a PROVIDENCE- PROVIDENCE PARK HOSPITAL-NOVI, and d/b/a PROVIDENCE PARK HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
June 2, 2021
b0526
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Chaklos v. St John Providence (William Chaklos v. St John Providence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.