William Carl Mixon v. United States

Fifth Circuit

William Carl Mixon v. United States

616 F.2d 253

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 30, 1980

Docket79-1497

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 616 F.2d 253 (William Carl Mixon v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Carl Mixon v. United States, 616 F.2d 253 (5th Cir. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A majority of the court being of the opinion that the petition for rehearing should be granted as to the Fed.R.Crim.P. Rule 11 issue, and inasmuch as the practice of this court forbids a divided vote in cases disposed of on its summary calendar, Fed.R.App.P. 34(a), 5th Cir. R. 18, this case shall be set down for oral argument, and this panel’s opinion in, 608 F.2d 588 (5th Cir. 1979) is accordingly VACATED.

FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., Circuit Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

A majority of the court being of the opinion that the petition for rehearing should be granted as to the Fed.R.Crim.P. Rule 11 issue, and inasmuch as the practice of this court forbids a divided vote in cases disposed of on its summary calendar, Fed.R.App.P. 34(a), 5th Cir. R. 18, this case shall be set down for oral argument, and this panel’s opinion in, 608 F.2d 588 (5th Cir. 1979) is accordingly VACATED.

FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., Circuit Judge, dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 F.2d 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-carl-mixon-v-united-states-ca5-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack