William Cameron & Co. v. Goodwin
239 F. 128, 152 C.C.A. 170, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2565
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 18, 1916·No. No. 2925·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinions
Considering that under the laws of Texas the owners of rented buildings have a so-called “preferential” lien (see Rev. Civ. Stat. Tex. 1911, Art. 5490), and that clerks, accountants, and laborers have a first lien only subordinate to the landlord’s lien in the case of farm hands (Id., §' 5644) we find that the priority in payment [130]*130accorded in the District Court under section 64d, Bankruptcy Daw (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 563 [Comp. St. 1913, § 9648]), was not erroneous.
The petition to superintend is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Cameron & Co. v. Goodwin, 239 F. 128, 152 C.C.A. 170, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2565 (5th Cir. 1916).
239 F. 128 (William Cameron & Co. v. Goodwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Dallas v. Ryan
62 F.2d 959 (Fifth Circuit, 1933)
In Re Brannon
62 F.2d 959 (Fifth Circuit, 1933)
In re Brannon
53 F.2d 401 (N.D. Texas, 1931)