William Cameron & Co. v. Goodwin

239 F. 128, 152 C.C.A. 170, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2565
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 18, 1916
DocketNo. 2925
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 239 F. 128 (William Cameron & Co. v. Goodwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Cameron & Co. v. Goodwin, 239 F. 128, 152 C.C.A. 170, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2565 (5th Cir. 1916).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Considering that under the laws of Texas the owners of rented buildings have a so-called “preferential” lien (see Rev. Civ. Stat. Tex. 1911, Art. 5490), and that clerks, accountants, and laborers have a first lien only subordinate to the landlord’s lien in the case of farm hands (Id., §' 5644) we find that the priority in payment [130]*130accorded in the District Court under section 64d, Bankruptcy Daw (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 563 [Comp. St. 1913, § 9648]), was not erroneous.

The petition to superintend is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Dallas v. Ryan
62 F.2d 959 (Fifth Circuit, 1933)
In Re Brannon
62 F.2d 959 (Fifth Circuit, 1933)
In re Brannon
53 F.2d 401 (N.D. Texas, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 F. 128, 152 C.C.A. 170, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-cameron-co-v-goodwin-ca5-1916.