William C. Titus v. Kimberly A. Kelly

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 5, 2015
Docket05-14-01045-CV
StatusPublished

This text of William C. Titus v. Kimberly A. Kelly (William C. Titus v. Kimberly A. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William C. Titus v. Kimberly A. Kelly, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

DISMISS; Opinion Filed February 4, 2015.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01045-CV

WILLIAM C. TITUS, Appellant V. KIMBERLY A. KELLY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-10004

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Myers, and Justice Evans Opinion by Justice Evans The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By

postcard dated July 11, 2014 we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed

appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to

do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated July 11, 2014, we notified

appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file

the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might

result in dismissal of this appeal. By letter dated September 16, 2014, we informed appellant the

clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay

for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements

to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant had been found to be

entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the

filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or otherwise

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

/ David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE 141045F.P05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

WILLIAM C. TITUS, Appellant On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-14-01045-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-10004. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. Chief KIMBERLY A. KELLY, Appellee Justice Wright and Justice Myers participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee KIMBERLY A. KELLY recover her costs of this appeal from appellant WILLIAM C. TITUS.

Judgment entered this 4th day of February, 2015.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
William C. Titus v. Kimberly A. Kelly, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-c-titus-v-kimberly-a-kelly-texapp-2015.