William C. Stolk and Eve Stolk v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Second Circuit

William C. Stolk and Eve Stolk v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

326 F.2d 760, 13 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 535, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6551

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 29, 1964

Docket28520

StatusPublished

This text of 326 F.2d 760 (William C. Stolk and Eve Stolk v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William C. Stolk and Eve Stolk v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 326 F.2d 760, 13 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 535, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6551 (2d Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

326 F.2d 760

William C. STOLK and Eve Stolk, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 250.

Docket 28520.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued January 29, 1964.

Decided January 29, 1964.

Kenneth C. Quencer, New York City, (Emil R. Annunziato, New York City, on the brief), for petitioners-appellants.

Frederick E. Youngman, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and Robert N. Anderson, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm in open court the decision of the Tax Court for the reasons stated in the majority opinion of that court, written by Judge Harron and reported at 40 T.C. 345 (1963).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI