William C. McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
This text of William C. McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (William C. McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
WILLIAM C. MCCALL, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D15-566
HSBC BANK USA, N.A., ET AL., Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed March 17, 2016.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Frederic A. Buttner, Judge.
Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, for Appellant.
Shaib Y. Rios of Brock & Scott, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM
We grant Appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous per
curiam affirmance, and substitute the following in its place.
AFFIRMED. See Brindise v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 41 Fla. L. Weekly
D223 (Jan. 20, 2016).
SWANSON, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William C. McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-c-mccall-v-hsbc-bank-usa-na-fladistctapp-2016.