William C. McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 16, 2016·No. 15-0566·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

WILLIAM C. MCCALL, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-566

HSBC BANK USA, N.A., ET AL., Appellee.

_____________________________/ Opinion filed March 17, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Frederic A. Buttner, Judge.

Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, for Appellant. Shaib Y. Rios of Brock & Scott, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM We grant Appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous per curiam affirmance, and substitute the following in its place.

AFFIRMED. See Brindise v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D223 (Jan. 20, 2016). SWANSON, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William C. McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

William C. McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (William C. McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.