William C. McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
WILLIAM C. MCCALL, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D15-566
HSBC BANK USA, N.A., ET AL., Appellee.
_____________________________/ Opinion filed March 17, 2016.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Frederic A. Buttner, Judge.
Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, for Appellant. Shaib Y. Rios of Brock & Scott, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM We grant Appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous per curiam affirmance, and substitute the following in its place.
AFFIRMED. See Brindise v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D223 (Jan. 20, 2016). SWANSON, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William C. McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (William C. McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.