William C. Gray v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Sixth Circuit

William C. Gray v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

38 F.3d 1216, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36976, 1994 WL 589510

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 25, 1994

Docket93-1481

StatusPublished

This text of 38 F.3d 1216 (William C. Gray v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William C. Gray v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 38 F.3d 1216, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36976, 1994 WL 589510 (6th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

38 F.3d 1216
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

William C. GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-1481.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 1994.

Before: MARTIN, NELSON, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, William C. Gray, appeals from the order of the district court which granted the Secretary's motion for summary judgment and affirmed the denial of benefits.

Having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that the decisions of the Appeals Council and the administrative law judge are not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the district court did not err in granting summary judgment to the Secretary, and the judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed upon the reasoning set forth in the district court's order granting summary judgment, dated February 8, 1993, and in the decision of the administrative law judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

38 F.3d 1216
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

William C. GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-1481.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 1994.

Before: MARTIN, NELSON, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, William C. Gray, appeals from the order of the district court which granted the Secretary's motion for summary judgment and affirmed the denial of benefits.

Having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that the decisions of the Appeals Council and the administrative law judge are not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the district court did not err in granting summary judgment to the Secretary, and the judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed upon the reasoning set forth in the district court's order granting summary judgment, dated February 8, 1993, and in the decision of the administrative law judge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 F.3d 1216, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36976, 1994 WL 589510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-c-gray-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-ser-ca6-1994.