William C. Forbis v. Educators Automobile Insurance Company
This text of 358 F.2d 747 (William C. Forbis v. Educators Automobile Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
358 F.2d 747
William C. FORBIS, Appellant,
v.
EDUCATORS AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 8283.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
April 12, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma; Frederick A. Daugherty, Judge.
Al Pugh, Oklahoma City, Okl. (Frantz C. Conrad and Paul Pugh, Oklahoma City, Okl., on brief), for appellant.
Charles W. Stubbs, Oklahoma City, Okl. (Burton J. Johnson, Oklahoma City, Okl., on brief), for appellee.
Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for reasons stated in the opinion of the trial court. Forbis v. Educators Automobile Insurance Company, D.C., 239 F.Supp. 667.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
358 F.2d 747, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-c-forbis-v-educators-automobile-insurance--ca10-1966.