William C. Ellis v. Anne Arundel County Housing Authority Larry Lyon Lori Mandrin

Fourth Circuit

William C. Ellis v. Anne Arundel County Housing Authority Larry Lyon Lori Mandrin

72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39529, 1995 WL 753397

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 20, 1995

Docket95-2623

StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 126 (William C. Ellis v. Anne Arundel County Housing Authority Larry Lyon Lori Mandrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William C. Ellis v. Anne Arundel County Housing Authority Larry Lyon Lori Mandrin, 72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39529, 1995 WL 753397 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

72 F.3d 126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William C. ELLIS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY; Larry Lyon; Lori
Mandrin, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-2623.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 30, 1995.
Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

William C. Ellis, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ellis v. Anne Arundel County, No. CA-95-2314-K (D.Md., Aug. 15, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and for a stay of the district court's proceedings pending appeal

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

72 F.3d 126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William C. ELLIS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY; Larry Lyon; Lori
Mandrin, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-2623.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 30, 1995.
Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

William C. Ellis, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ellis v. Anne Arundel County, No. CA-95-2314-K (D.Md., Aug. 15, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and for a stay of the district court's proceedings pending appeal

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39529, 1995 WL 753397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-c-ellis-v-anne-arundel-county-housing-auth-ca4-1995.