William C. Cocke, Individually and in the Right of Seashore Properties, Inc. v. E. Paul Schexnailder, Individually and as Officer and Director of Seashore Properties, Inc. Chase Bank, of the Estate of C. Bert Williams Asset Development Corporation and Seashore Properties, Inc.
This text of William C. Cocke, Individually and in the Right of Seashore Properties, Inc. v. E. Paul Schexnailder, Individually and as Officer and Director of Seashore Properties, Inc. Chase Bank, of the Estate of C. Bert Williams Asset Development Corporation and Seashore Properties, Inc. (William C. Cocke, Individually and in the Right of Seashore Properties, Inc. v. E. Paul Schexnailder, Individually and as Officer and Director of Seashore Properties, Inc. Chase Bank, of the Estate of C. Bert Williams Asset Development Corporation and Seashore Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
____________________________________________________________________
WILLIAM C. COCKE, INDIVIDUALLY
AND IN THE RIGHT OF SEASHORE PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant,
E. PAUL SCHEXNAILDER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF SEASHORE
PROPERTIES, INC., ET AL., Appellees.
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
Appellant, WILLIAM C. COCKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THE RIGHT OF SEASHORE PROPERTIES, INC., attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause no. 96-04721-A. The clerk's record was received on January 25, 2002, and the supplemental clerk's record was received on April 3, 2002.
Upon review of the clerk's record, it appeared that the order from this appeal was taken was not a final, appealable order. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant has filed a response in which he requests that this Court adjudicate that the underlying order is not final, dismiss the appeal, and remand the case to the trial court.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's response, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 25th day of July, 2002.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William C. Cocke, Individually and in the Right of Seashore Properties, Inc. v. E. Paul Schexnailder, Individually and as Officer and Director of Seashore Properties, Inc. Chase Bank, of the Estate of C. Bert Williams Asset Development Corporation and Seashore Properties, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-c-cocke-individually-and-in-the-right-of-seashore-properties-texapp-2002.