William C. Byrd and Joel Rubinstein v. Merit Systems Protection Board

39 F.3d 1196, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37589, 1994 WL 541593
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedOctober 4, 1994
Docket94-3107
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 F.3d 1196 (William C. Byrd and Joel Rubinstein v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William C. Byrd and Joel Rubinstein v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 39 F.3d 1196, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37589, 1994 WL 541593 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Opinion

39 F.3d 1196

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
William C. BYRD and Joel Rubinstein, Petitioners,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 94-3107.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 4, 1994.

Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allan Stringfellow v. Department of Agriculture
Merit Systems Protection Board, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 F.3d 1196, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37589, 1994 WL 541593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-c-byrd-and-joel-rubinstein-v-merit-systems-cafc-1994.