William Brandon Pitchford v. State
This text of William Brandon Pitchford v. State (William Brandon Pitchford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00630-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
WILLIAM BRANDON PITCHFORD, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 252nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Counsel for appellant filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. In a signed
attachment, appellant states that he no longer wishes to pursue his appeal. We find the
motion and attachment together meet the requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and his attorney must sign a written motion to dismiss
the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and
dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for
rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 5th day of January, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William Brandon Pitchford v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-brandon-pitchford-v-state-texapp-2012.