William Branch Justus Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 23, 2008
Docket14-06-00741-CR
StatusPublished

This text of William Branch Justus Jr. v. State (William Branch Justus Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Branch Justus Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Affirmed and Opinion filed October 23, 2008

Affirmed and Opinion filed October 23, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00741-CR

WILLIAM BRANCH JUSTUS JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 9

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1374821

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of the offense of driving while intoxicated. On August 17, 2006, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 180 days in the Harris County Jail and assessed a fine in the amount of $1,000.


Appellant is represented by retained counsel, Michael S. McNeely.  Appellant=s brief was originally due April 11, 2007.  On April 17, 2007, counsel was notified the brief was past due.  On April 27, 2007, counsel requested an extension of time to file his brief.  An extension was granted, until June 11, 2007.  When we granted this extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted, absent exceptional circumstances.  Counsel failed to file a brief on June 11, 2007.  On June 19, 2007, counsel was again notified that his brief was past due.  On July 3, 2007, counsel requested another extension of time to file his brief.  An extension was granted until August 10, 2007.   When we granted this extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted.  Counsel again failed to submit a brief.  On August 23, 2007, we ordered counsel to file a brief on or before September 10, 2007.  No brief was filed and no response from counsel was received.  On September 27, 2007, we abated this appeal and ordered a hearing in the trial court.  A hearing was held and counsel represented to the trial court he would file a brief on or before November 15, 2007.  No brief was filed.  On December 13, 2007, the appeal was reinstated and counsel was again ordered to file his brief, this time on or before January 14, 2008.  Again, no brief was filed.  On January 18, 2008, counsel filed another motion for extension of time to file his brief, requesting another forty-seven days, until March 1, 2008.

On January 31, 2008, the motion was denied and Michael S. McNeely ordered to file a brief with the clerk of this Court on or before February 29, 2008.  Appellant was informed that no further extensions would be granted and if Michael S. McNeely did not timely file the brief as ordered, the Court would consider and decide the appeal on the record without benefit of appellant=s brief.  See Tex. R. App. P.  38.8(b)(4).  No brief has been filed.

Accordingly, this court has considered the appeal without briefs.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4).  We find no fundamental error.  See generally Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994).


The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed October 23, 2008.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Anderson, and Frost.

Do not publish - Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lott v. State
874 S.W.2d 687 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
William Branch Justus Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-branch-justus-jr-v-state-texapp-2008.