William Bernard, Inc. v. Cowen

82 Misc. 384
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 82 Misc. 384 (William Bernard, Inc. v. Cowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Bernard, Inc. v. Cowen, 82 Misc. 384 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Guy, J.

Costs upon a motion, not disposing of the merits of a cause, even though awarded by an order of the Appellate Division, are deemed interlocutory and are not enforcible against real property or by supplementary proceedings. Code Civ. Pro., § 779; Matter of Pettis v. Schwartz, 139 App. Div. 904; Matter of Stoddard, 128 id. 759; Seabury City Court Practice, 1096, 1097.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Seabuby and Bijur, JJ., concur.

Order reversed with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pettis v. Schwartz
139 A.D. 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 Misc. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-bernard-inc-v-cowen-nyappterm-1913.