William Baptiste Bloys v. the State of Texas
This text of William Baptiste Bloys v. the State of Texas (William Baptiste Bloys v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00096-CR
William Baptiste Bloys, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY NO. CR8500, THE HONORABLE J. ALLAN GARRETT, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due April 11, 2024, but following an
abatement was scheduled to be due June 20, 2024. On counsel’s motions, the time for filing was
extended to August 21, 2024. Appellant’s counsel has now filed a third motion, requesting that
the Court extend the time for filing appellant’s brief. In both his second and third motions,
appellant’s counsel has represented that he believes appellant wants to dismiss his appeal.
Appellant’s counsel also asserts that he sent a motion to dismiss to appellant for appellant’s
signature but that appellant has not yet returned the motion with his signature.
In light of the preceding, we abate this appeal to allow the trial court to conduct a
hearing to determine whether appellant wishes to prosecute his appeal. See Trejo v. State, No. 04-
14-00731-CR, 2015 WL 1247272, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 18, 2015, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (noting that appellate court abated appeal to
determine whether appellant desired to pursue appeal); see also Tex. R. App. P. 43.6 (permitting
courts of appeals to make “any other appropriate order that the law and the nature of the case
require”). If the trial court determines during the hearing that appellant does not wish to pursue
this appeal, it shall direct appellant and his attorney to submit a motion to dismiss with this Court
that complies with Rule 42.2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. On
the other hand, if the trial court determines that appellant does wish to pursue his appeal, it shall
inform appellant and his attorney that his appellant’s brief is due 30 days from the date of the
hearing, that no further extensions will be granted, and that the failure to timely file a brief will
result in this Court ordering a hearing under Rule 38.8. See id. R. 38.8 (authorizing appellate
courts to abate appeal for hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute appeal).
On remand, the trial court shall make appropriate written findings and
recommendations. Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order
the appropriate supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings, conclusions,
and orders, if any—to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than September 23, 2024.
See id. R. 34.5(c)(2), .6(d) (authorizing supplementation of clerk’s and reporter’s records).
It is ordered on August 30, 2024.
Before Justices Baker, Smith, and Theofanis
Abated and Remanded
Filed: August 30, 2024
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William Baptiste Bloys v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-baptiste-bloys-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.