William B. Harris Co. v. Kirchofer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

William B. Harris Co. v. Kirchofer

99 N.Y.S. 1151

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 99 N.Y.S. 1151 (William B. Harris Co. v. Kirchofer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William B. Harris Co. v. Kirchofer, 99 N.Y.S. 1151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In affirming this judgment we were led to believe that the admission in the answer by the defendants of a liability to the plaintiff and a tender of the admitted amount due had been followed up by a payment of such amount into court. It now appears that such was not the fact, and therefore the judgment should have been reversed. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In affirming this judgment we were led to believe that the admission in the answer by the defendants of a liability to the plaintiff and a tender of the admitted amount due had been followed up by a payment of such amount into court. It now appears that such was not the fact, and therefore the judgment should have been reversed. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 N.Y.S. 1151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-b-harris-co-v-kirchofer-nyappterm-1906.