William Archie Mayfield, Jr. v. Bill Steed, Acting Commissioner of the Department of Corrections

473 F.2d 691, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11824
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 6, 1973·No. 72-1568·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the District Court granting a writ of habeas corpus to William Archie May-field, Jr. (Mayfield). We affirm.

Mayfield was convicted of second degree murder in Arkansas state court by a jury from which all women were admittedly systematically excluded. His conviction was affirmed by the Arkansas Supreme Court. Judge Eisele, in a soundly reasoned memorandum opinion, held that the systematic exclusion of .women is impermissible under the rationale of Peters v. Kiff, 407 U.S. 493, 92 S.Ct. 2163, 33 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972), and Ballard v. United States, 329 U.S. 187, 67 S.Ct. 261, 91 L.Ed. 181 (1946).

Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 8 of the rules of this Court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court on the basis of its memorandum opinion. Mayfield v. Steed, 345 F.Supp. 806 (E.D.Ark.1972)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Archie Mayfield, Jr. v. Bill Steed, Acting Commissioner of the Department of Corrections, 473 F.2d 691, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11824 (8th Cir. 1973).

473 F.2d 691 (William Archie Mayfield, Jr. v. Bill Steed, Acting Commissioner of the Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Breland
522 F. Supp. 468 (N.D. Georgia, 1981)
Quick v. Harris
202 S.E.2d 869 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1974)