William Anthony Brooks v. Robert Francis, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
728 F.2d 1358, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24499
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 15, 1984·No. 83-8028·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinion
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Anthony Brooks v. Robert Francis, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, 728 F.2d 1358, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24499 (11th Cir. 1984).
728 F.2d 1358 (William Anthony Brooks v. Robert Francis, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lesko v. Lehman
925 F.2d 1527 (Third Circuit, 1991)
William Anthony Brooks v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent
762 F.2d 1383 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Richard Tucker v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent
762 F.2d 1496 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Warren McCleskey Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Cross-Appellee
753 F.2d 877 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
David Jarrell v. Charles Balkcom, Warden
735 F.2d 1242 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
Van Roosevelt Solomon v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center
735 F.2d 395 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
Stephens v. Kemp
592 F. Supp. 228 (S.D. Georgia, 1984)
Claude W. Albert, Jr. v. Charles M. Montgomery
732 F.2d 865 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)