William and Lyn Maize v. Mustafa Nadaf
This text of William and Lyn Maize v. Mustafa Nadaf (William and Lyn Maize v. Mustafa Nadaf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00297-CV
WILLIAM AND LYN MAIZE APPELLANTS
V.
MUSTAFA NADAF APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On August 26, 2013, and September 11, 2013, we notified appellants in
accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this
appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).
Appellants have not paid the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellants failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of
appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2007,2
we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).
Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: October 3, 2013
2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in courts of appeals).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William and Lyn Maize v. Mustafa Nadaf, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-and-lyn-maize-v-mustafa-nadaf-texapp-2013.