William Alva Carte v. John C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas

347 F.2d 364, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5166
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 1965
Docket8051
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 347 F.2d 364 (William Alva Carte v. John C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Alva Carte v. John C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, 347 F.2d 364, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5166 (10th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, dismissing, without a hearing, Carte’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Carte was sentenced in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri and is serving his sentence in the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. The petition alleges only that the sentence is void because of ambiguity. The remedy provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is exclusive unless it is shown to be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of the detention. Barkan v. United States, 10 Cir., 341 F.2d 95; Oughton v. United States, 10 Cir., 310 F. 2d 803, cert. denied 373 U.S. 937, 83 S. Ct. 1542, 10 L.Ed.2d 693; Sanchez v. Taylor, 10 Cir., 302 F.2d 725, cert. denied 371 U.S. 864, 83 S.Ct. 124, 9 L.Ed.2d 101; Black v. United States, 10 Cir., 301 F.2d 418, cert. denied 370 U.S. 932, 82 S.Ct. 1618, 8 L.Ed.2d 832; Martin v. Taylor, 10 Cir., 296 F.2d 739.

There being no allegations in the petition which indicate that the remedy provided for in Section 2255 is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of the prisoner’s detention, there was no error in dismissing the petition without a hearing.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John G. Westine v. W.A. Perrill, Warden
60 F.3d 838 (Tenth Circuit, 1995)
McDowell v. Moseley
315 F. Supp. 971 (D. Kansas, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
347 F.2d 364, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-alva-carte-v-john-c-taylor-warden-united-states-penitentiary-ca10-1965.