William Adams, Inc. v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 1071
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in William Adams, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 Cust. Ct. 429 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 3, 1969·No. No. P69/59; protests 62/4181, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of glass articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc., et al. v. United States (59 Cust. Ct. 529, C.D. 3221), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Adams, Inc. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1071 (cusc 1969).
62 Cust. Ct. 1071 (William Adams, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 529 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)