William A. Tahl v. Joseph O'connor, Sheriff, San Diego County

460 F.2d 1068, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8956
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 16, 1972
Docket72-1116
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 460 F.2d 1068 (William A. Tahl v. Joseph O'connor, Sheriff, San Diego County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William A. Tahl v. Joseph O'connor, Sheriff, San Diego County, 460 F.2d 1068, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8956 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, denied to petitioner, a state pris *1069 oner, after his plea of guilty to two counts of murder, one count of attempted robbery, one count of rape, and one count of grand theft auto, while represented by counsel. In re Tahl, 1 Cal.3d 122, 129, 81 Cal.Rptr. 577, 460 P.2d 449 (1969).

The petition rests upon four grounds, all treated at length by the United States District Court Judge in an excellent, painstaking decision appearing at 336 F.Supp. 576.

We affirm the District Court’s judgment finding each of the petitioner’s contentions of error to be without merit.

We also cite the triumvirate cases of Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); Mc-Mann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1970); Parker v. North Carolina, 397 U.S. 790, 90 S.Ct. 1458, 25 L.Ed.2d 785 (1970).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Munden v. State
698 P.2d 621 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 F.2d 1068, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-a-tahl-v-joseph-oconnor-sheriff-san-diego-county-ca9-1972.