William A. Scott v. Dr. Curtis Tarr, National Director of Selective Service
This text of 469 F.2d 1392 (William A. Scott v. Dr. Curtis Tarr, National Director of Selective Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William A. SCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dr. Curtis TARR, National Director of Selective Service, et
al., Respondents-Appellees.
No. 194, Docket 72-1679.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 30, 1972.
Decided Jan. 9, 1973.
Marvin M. Karpatkin, American Civil Liberties Union, New York City, (New York Civil Liberties Union by Jeremiah S. Gutman, New York City, Margrethe Powers, Albany, N. Y., American Civil Liberties Union Foundation by Melvin L. Wulf, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner-appellant.
James E. Cullum, Asst. U. S. Atty., Albany, N. Y. (James M. Sullivan, Jr., U. S. Atty., N. D. N. Y., of counsel), for respondents-appellees.
Before FRIENDLY, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In view of the fact that appellant was released from civilian work on December 13, 1972, we are constrained to dismiss his appeal, without costs and to direct that the order of the district court be vacated, on the ground that the case has become moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
469 F.2d 1392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-a-scott-v-dr-curtis-tarr-national-director-ca2-1973.