William A. Rogers, Inc. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 783
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in William A. Rogers, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 59 Cust. Ct. 421 →
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William A. Rogers, Inc. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 783 (cusc 1966).
57 Cust. Ct. 783 (William A. Rogers, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.