William A. Bacher, Joseph H. Sage, Etc. v. Joseph Patrick Patencio
368 F.2d 1010, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4193
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 1, 1966·No. 19682·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinions
The majority agrees with the reasoning of Judge Byrne in the court below. [1011]*1011232 F.Supp. 939 (S.D.Cal.1964). The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William A. Bacher, Joseph H. Sage, Etc. v. Joseph Patrick Patencio, 368 F.2d 1010, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4193 (9th Cir. 1966).
368 F.2d 1010 (William A. Bacher, Joseph H. Sage, Etc. v. Joseph Patrick Patencio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estoril Producing Corp. v. Murdock
1991 OK CIV APP 122 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1991)
Nellie Atkins Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd., a Limited Partnership
508 F.2d 518 (Tenth Circuit, 1975)
Edwin E. Lawrence, Carolee Lawrence v. United States of America, United States of America, as Trustee, Flora Cruz, Austin Cruz
381 F.2d 989 (Ninth Circuit, 1967)