William A. Bacher, Joseph H. Sage, Etc. v. Joseph Patrick Patencio
368 F.2d 1010, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4193
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 1, 1966
Docket19682
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 368 F.2d 1010 (William A. Bacher, Joseph H. Sage, Etc. v. Joseph Patrick Patencio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
William A. Bacher, Joseph H. Sage, Etc. v. Joseph Patrick Patencio, 368 F.2d 1010, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4193 (9th Cir. 1966).
Opinions
The majority agrees with the reasoning of Judge Byrne in the court below. [1011]*1011232 F.Supp. 939 (S.D.Cal.1964). The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Estoril Producing Corp. v. Murdock
1991 OK CIV APP 122 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1991)
Nellie Atkins Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd., a Limited Partnership
508 F.2d 518 (Tenth Circuit, 1975)
Edwin E. Lawrence, Carolee Lawrence v. United States of America, United States of America, as Trustee, Flora Cruz, Austin Cruz
381 F.2d 989 (Ninth Circuit, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
368 F.2d 1010, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-a-bacher-joseph-h-sage-etc-v-joseph-patrick-patencio-ca9-1966.