Willhoit v. Willhoit

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Willhoit v. Willhoit

1942 OK 217, 126 P.2d 242, 190 Okla. 620, 1942 Okla. LEXIS 164

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 26, 1942

DocketNo. 30627.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1942 OK 217 (Willhoit v. Willhoit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willhoit v. Willhoit, 1942 OK 217, 126 P.2d 242, 190 Okla. 620, 1942 Okla. LEXIS 164 (Okla. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Claude A. Willhoit, hereinafter called plaintiff, from an order refusing to vacate a judgment obtained by Jennie Willhoit in a divorce proceeding. After petition in error and case-made had been filed herein on January 13, 1942, this court ordered the plaintiff in error to pay $100 for the use and benefit of the attorneys for the defendant in error. This order has not been complied with. In Philpott v. Philpott, 164 Okla. 266, 23 P. 2d 641, we said:

“Where- the plaintiff in error is ordered by the court to pay alimony and expense money and refuses to comply with the said order, the court may in its discretion dismiss the appeal.”

It appearing that there has been a refusal to comply with the order of this court, the case is dismissed.

CORN, V. C.. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur. WELCH, C. J., and DAVISON and ARNOLD, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI