Willhelms v. Partoine
72 Ga. 898
This text of 72 Ga. 898 (Willhelms v. Partoine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Willhelms v. Partoine, 72 Ga. 898 (Ga. 1884).
Opinion
That a promissory note concludes with the words, “witness our hand and seal,” does not alone make the note a sealed instrument, without the addition of a seal or scroll. These words call attention to the attestation to be made, but do not supply the place of a seal or the representation thereof after the signature. Brooks vs. Kisers, 69 Ga., 762.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Edwards v. City of Atlanta
76 S.E.2d 635 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Chastain v. L. Moss Music Co.
64 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Crosby v. Burkhalter
179 S.E. 180 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Marshall v. Walker
178 S.E. 760 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Hamby v. Crisp
172 S.E. 842 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
National Surety Co. v. Farmers State Bank
89 S.E. 581 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Ridley v. Hightower
37 S.E. 733 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
72 Ga. 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willhelms-v-partoine-ga-1884.