Willhelm v. Bull

Indiana Supreme Court

Willhelm v. Bull

19 Ind. 227

DecidedNovember 15, 1862

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ind. 227 (Willhelm v. Bull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willhelm v. Bull, 19 Ind. 227 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case there was judgment by default, and no steps taken below to set it aside, or to review the judgment for error. According to numerous rulings of this Court, we can not examine the record for errors, especially as the time had not elapsed when this appeal was taken, within which one of the remedies above alluded to would be barred. The policy is to compel parties to obtain redress in the Courts below, where opportunity remains to do so.

W. JR. Pierse, JHJ. JD. Thompson, and JR. N. Williams, for the appellants. John Brownlee, for the appellee.

The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this case there was judgment by default, and no steps taken below to set it aside, or to review the judgment for error. According to numerous rulings of this Court, we can not examine the record for errors, especially as the time had not elapsed when this appeal was taken, within which one of the remedies above alluded to would be barred. The policy is to compel parties to obtain redress in the Courts below, where opportunity remains to do so.

W. JR. Pierse, JHJ. JD. Thompson, and JR. N. Williams, for the appellants. John Brownlee, for the appellee.

The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Ind. 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willhelm-v-bull-ind-1862.