Willey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Willey v. State

862 So. 2d 97, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17544, 2003 WL 22715620

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 19, 2003

DocketNo. 2D03-314

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 862 So. 2d 97 (Willey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willey v. State, 862 So. 2d 97, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17544, 2003 WL 22715620 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

On January 13, 2003, Robert Willey filed this appeal to challenge the amount of restitution the trial court ordered him to pay at a December 16, 2002 hearing. He contends that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay $220 in restitution because the victim suffered a loss of only $120. Appellate counsel sought and was granted leave from this court to have the record supplemented with the restitution order entered on December 16, 2002. The circuit court clerk certified that no order of restitution was filed as a result of the hearing on that date.

At Willey’s sentencing hearing on November 6, 2002, the trial court orally ordered that Willey pay, consistent with his plea agreement, $60 in restitution. The order of probation filed on January 13, 2003, reflects that restitution amount. Accordingly, we affirm the restitution amount of $60.

Affirmed.

SALCINES and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHATLEY, Judge.

On January 13, 2003, Robert Willey filed this appeal to challenge the amount of restitution the trial court ordered him to pay at a December 16, 2002 hearing. He contends that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay $220 in restitution because the victim suffered a loss of only $120. Appellate counsel sought and was granted leave from this court to have the record supplemented with the restitution order entered on December 16, 2002. The circuit court clerk certified that no order of restitution was filed as a result of the hearing on that date.

At Willey’s sentencing hearing on November 6, 2002, the trial court orally ordered that Willey pay, consistent with his plea agreement, $60 in restitution. The order of probation filed on January 13, 2003, reflects that restitution amount. Accordingly, we affirm the restitution amount of $60.

Affirmed.

SALCINES and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

862 So. 2d 97, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17544, 2003 WL 22715620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willey-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack