Willey v. Paul

49 N.H. 397
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 15, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 N.H. 397 (Willey v. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willey v. Paul, 49 N.H. 397 (N.H. 1870).

Opinion

Smith, J.

Flanders v. Grand Trunk Railway Company, (Coos July term, 1868,) was an action on the case against common carriers for failurejo deliver freight within a reasonable time. It was there held that the plaintiff could not recover damages for the loss occasioned by the failure to fulfill a contract with a third person for the sale of the freight, if such damages were not specially averred in the declaration : see also, 2 Greenl. Ev. sec. 254; 1Chitty Pl. 395-397.

The same principle should be applied iu actions of trespass, and is decisive of the present case. It would be unreasonable to hold that notice of the claim for these special dameges was given by the use of such a vague and indefinite expression as “alia enormia.”

Ward v. Smith, 11 Price 19, cited by plaintiff, is not in point; neither in that case, or in Roberts v. Graham, 6 Wallace 578, was the plaintiff allowed to recover under a general averment, damages on account of any contract between himself and a third person.

Plaintiff should remit the special damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carpenter v. Bailey
56 N.H. 283 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 N.H. 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willey-v-paul-nh-1870.