Willett v. Peppers Cotton Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Willett v. Peppers Cotton Lumber Co.

266 P. 1028, 91 Cal. App. 798, 1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 1026

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 24, 1928

DocketDocket No. 3493.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 P. 1028 (Willett v. Peppers Cotton Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willett v. Peppers Cotton Lumber Co., 266 P. 1028, 91 Cal. App. 798, 1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 1026 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

BARTLETT, J., pro tem.

This appeal by plaintiff from orders of the superior court of Siskiyou County, sustaining without leave to amend, demurrers of defendants, other than Peppers Cotton Lumber Company, to plaintiff’s complaint, and from the judgments entered in said action, involves the same issues of law as were raised and presented in the case of P. L. Burr v. Peppers Cotton Lumber Co. (a *799 California, Corporation) et. al., ante, p. 268 [266 Pac. 1025]. the decision in which is this day filed. It was stipulated in this case that the briefs filed in the Burr case should be considered in the determination of this appeal.

Upon the authority of the decision in said ease, the judgments appealed from are affirmed.

Hart, Acting P. J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on May 24, 1928, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 21, 1928.

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARTLETT, J., pro tem.

This appeal by plaintiff from orders of the superior court of Siskiyou County, sustaining without leave to amend, demurrers of defendants, other than Peppers Cotton Lumber Company, to plaintiff’s complaint, and from the judgments entered in said action, involves the same issues of law as were raised and presented in the case of P. L. Burr v. Peppers Cotton Lumber Co. (a *799 California, Corporation) et. al., ante, p. 268 [266 Pac. 1025]. the decision in which is this day filed. It was stipulated in this case that the briefs filed in the Burr case should be considered in the determination of this appeal.

Upon the authority of the decision in said ease, the judgments appealed from are affirmed.

Hart, Acting P. J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on May 24, 1928, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 21, 1928.

All the Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 P. 1028, 91 Cal. App. 798, 1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 1026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willett-v-peppers-cotton-lumber-co-calctapp-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack