Willett v. Larch

127 N.E. 546, 189 Ind. 410, 1920 Ind. LEXIS 37
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 1920·No. No. 23,394·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Lairy, J.

The brief filed by appellant on this appeal does not present any question for decision by this court. It would serve no useful purpose to point out in detail the defects in the brief.. The sufficiency of appellant’s brief to present any question for decision was promptly challenged by appellee in • a formal motion wherein the defects were specifically pointed out; but no steps have been taken to cure the defects by amending the brief so as to conform to the rules of court.

As the brief presents no question for decision, there can be no occasion for an oral argument. The petition of appellant for oral argument is therefore denied, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willett v. Larch, 127 N.E. 546, 189 Ind. 410, 1920 Ind. LEXIS 37 (Ind. 1920).

127 N.E. 546 (Willett v. Larch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCloud v. Truax, Rec.
11 N.E.2d 517 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1937)
Martin v. Petgin
11 N.E.2d 59 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1937)
Bruner v. State
164 N.E. 272 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1928)
Campton v. Middleton Bros.
136 N.E. 581 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1922)
Hobbs v. King
135 N.E. 892 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1922)