Willett v. City University of New York School of Law at Queens College

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Willett v. City University of New York School of Law at Queens College

255 A.D.2d 518, 680 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12630

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D.2d 518 (Willett v. City University of New York School of Law at Queens College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willett v. City University of New York School of Law at Queens College, 255 A.D.2d 518, 680 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the City University of New York Law School dated December 16, 1994, finding that the petitioner had violated certain by-laws and imposing two concurrent one-year suspensions, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), dated July 9, 1997, which denied his motion to renew an earlier petition for the same relief, which was dismissed by judgment of the same court dated June 5, 1995.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petitioner’s motion to renew his CPLR article 78 petition since he failed to offer a valid excuse for not submitting the additional facts upon the original application (see, Matter of Brooklyn Welding Corp. v Chin, 236 AD2d 392; Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558). O’Brien, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the City University of New York Law School dated December 16, 1994, finding that the petitioner had violated certain by-laws and imposing two concurrent one-year suspensions, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), dated July 9, 1997, which denied his motion to renew an earlier petition for the same relief, which was dismissed by judgment of the same court dated June 5, 1995.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petitioner’s motion to renew his CPLR article 78 petition since he failed to offer a valid excuse for not submitting the additional facts upon the original application (see, Matter of Brooklyn Welding Corp. v Chin, 236 AD2d 392; Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558). O’Brien, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 518, 680 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willett-v-city-university-of-new-york-school-of-law-at-queens-college-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack