Willets Point Contracting Corp. v. Hartford Insurance Group

423 N.E.2d 42, 53 N.Y.2d 879, 440 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2456
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 1981·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum:.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

While the comprehensive general liability policy’s broad definition of property damage provides coverage for loss of use of tangible personal property without physical damage thereto, exclusion “(m)” explicitly disclaims coverage where the injury results from a breach of contract, as in this case. As to the umbrella policy, its narrower definition of property damage does not encompass the nonphysical injury suffered by the plaintiff. Thus even though the alleged “ultimate net loss” was in excess of this policy’s $10,000 “retained limit”, the insurer’s obligation to indemnify was not triggered.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willets Point Contracting Corp. v. Hartford Insurance Group, 423 N.E.2d 42, 53 N.Y.2d 879, 440 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2456 (N.Y. 1981).

423 N.E.2d 42 (Willets Point Contracting Corp. v. Hartford Insurance Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hotel des Artistes, Inc. v. General Accident Insurance of America
9 A.D.3d 181 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Bernstein v. National Union Fire Insurance
181 A.D.2d 445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Ogden Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
681 F. Supp. 169 (S.D. New York, 1988)
Unifoil Corp. v. CNA Ins. Companies
528 A.2d 47 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.
458 N.E.2d 338 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1983)