Willet v. Willet

3 Watts 277
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 15, 1834
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 3 Watts 277 (Willet v. Willet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willet v. Willet, 3 Watts 277 (Pa. 1834).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Rogers, J.

This is the ordinary case of an action for the illegal detention of a personal chattel, for which trover is the proper remedy. But to support assumpsit, the form of action which the plaintiff thought proper to adopt to try the right of property, the court instructed the jury that they might presume a sale by the plaintiff to the defendant. I cannot perceive, nor has the counsel attempted to point out, the slightest testimony by which the jury would be warranted in making any such presumption. On the argument this ground wa.s abandoned, and the plaintiff contends that he may waive the tort, and recover the value of the goods; but this can only be done when the tortfeasor has sold the article and received the money. In such a case an action for money had and received may be sustained.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welsh v. National Dime Bank
54 Pa. D. & C. 479 (Northumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1945)
Anderson Equipment Co. v. Findley
39 A.2d 520 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Braithwaite v. Akin
56 N.W. 133 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1893)
Bethlehem Borough v. Perseverance Fire Co.
81 Pa. 445 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1876)
Moses v. Arnold
43 Iowa 187 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1876)
Satterlee v. Melick
76 Pa. 62 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1874)
Watson v. Stever
25 Mich. 386 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1872)
Gordon v. Bruner
49 Mo. 570 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1872)
Deysher v. Triebel
64 Pa. 383 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1870)
Fuller v. Duren
36 Ala. 73 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1860)
Barrett v. Koella
2 F. Cas. 927 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Wisconsin, 1857)
Bowman v. Browning
17 Ark. 599 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1856)
Crow v. Boyd's Administrators
17 Ala. 51 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1849)
Osborn v. Bell
5 Denio 370 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)
Almy v. Wilbur
1 F. Cas. 540 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island, 1846)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Watts 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willet-v-willet-pa-1834.