Willes v. Pitkin
1 Root 47
Opinion
The law is so upon the facts aforesaid that the money was not liable to be taken as the property of said Troop. Eor 1st, The money received and indorsed on the execution, by the officer, is his special property, for which he is liable to the person to whom it is due; and 2d, The general property is in the assignee, by force of the assignment, and not in the promisee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Willes v. Pitkin, 1 Root 47 (Colo. Ct. App. 1764).
1 Root 47 (Willes v. Pitkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New Haven Steam Saw-Mill Co. v. Fowler
28 Conn. 103 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1859)
Camp v. Tompkins
9 Conn. 553 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1833)