Willcox v. Arnold
This text of 39 N.E. 414 (Willcox v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence was sufficient to warrant the finding of the court. It was competent for the court to infer from all the evidence that the defendants who were present at the class meeting at which it was voted to publish a volume to be called “ The Brown and Blue ” either voted to publish the volume or assented to the vote. This is also true of the vote by which Arnold was elected “ business manager of the publication.” The contract made by Arnold was apparently within [579]*579the scope of his employment, at least the court could so find. Newell v. Borden, 128 Mass. 31. Ray v. Powers, 134 Mass. 22.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 N.E. 414, 162 Mass. 577, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willcox-v-arnold-mass-1895.