Willard v. Ward
This text of 3 Mass. 24 (Willard v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We always require evidence to support the allegations in the petition. The legal costs which the respondent can tax, in case the petitioner fails of success, are quite an insufficient recompense for being compelled to appear and answer to a complaint which may be idle or vexatious.
Upon Bigelow’s urging some circumstances of hardship in the petitioner’s case, and stipulating to pay double costs, if he failed of obtaining a review, the Court made a rule to show cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Mass. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willard-v-ward-mass-1807.