Willard v. Kunda

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 31, 2011
• Docket: 11-1120
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1120

DOUGLAS E. WILLARD; DEBRA WILLARD,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

and

WHITETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

KAREN KUNDA; ADAM KUNDA; HACK'S POINT GENERAL STORE, INCORPORATED; CECIL BANCORP, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Cecil Bank; CHARLES F. SPOSATO, SR.; MARY B. HALSEY; SANDRA D. FELTMAN; ANTHONY MOSS; BRIAN LOCKHART; CECIL BANK,

Defendants - Appellees,

WAYNE HOLMQUIST; NANCY HOLMQUIST,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00326-JFM)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas E. Willard and Debra Willard, Appellants Pro Se. David Matthew Wyand, ROSENBERG, MARTIN & GREENBERG, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Douglas E. Willard and Debra Willard appeal the

district court’s orders dismissing their civil action and

denying their motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Willard v. Kunda, No.

1:10-cv-00326-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 11, 2010 & Jan. 14, 2011). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED