Willard v. Greenwood
This text of 117 N.E. 823 (Willard v. Greenwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judge before whom this case was tried without a jury having been warranted in finding on the record, that the defendant Carrie M. Greenwood signed the promissory note in suit as a joint and several maker with full knowledge of its tenor and that the consideration therefor was money lent by the plaintiff to her husband to be secured by a mortgage on his real estate, properly refused all the defendants’ requests. R. L. c. 153, § 2; c. 73, § 41. Harvey v. Squire, 217 Mass. 411, 414. Hooper v. Cuneo, 227 Mass. 37, 40.
Nor do we discover any error of law because the memorandum or decision of the judge was not communicated or announced to counsel until some time after the case had been reserved for consideration.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 N.E. 823, 228 Mass. 549, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willard-v-greenwood-mass-1917.