Willard v. Dretke
This text of Willard v. Dretke (Willard v. Dretke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 26, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-10399 Summary Calendar
BOBBY W. WILLARD,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,
Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:02-CV-111-C --------------------
Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Bobby W. Willard, Texas prisoner # 921559, requests a
certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the denial of his
FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) motion. By that motion, Willard sought to
reopen the case dismissing 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition in order to
enable him to pursue an appeal after his original appeal was
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-10399 -2-
Contrary to Willard’s assertion, a COA is not required. See
Dunn v. Cockrell, 302 F.3d 491, 492 (5th Cir. 2002), cert.
denied, 537 U.S. 1181 (2003). The COA request is therefore
DENIED AS UNNECESSARY. See id. The district court’s denial of
Willard’s FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) motion is AFFIRMED. See id.
COA DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Willard v. Dretke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willard-v-dretke-ca5-2004.