Willametz v. Goldfeld

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Willametz v. Goldfeld

344 A.2d 359, 169 Conn. 709

DecidedSeptember 24, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 344 A.2d 359 (Willametz v. Goldfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willametz v. Goldfeld, 344 A.2d 359, 169 Conn. 709 (Colo. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff’s application to permit Attorney J. Francis Hayden of the New York bar to appear pro hac vice is granted to the extent that Attorney Hayden is granted permission to participate in writing briefs and presenting argument in this court in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County, provided that all briefs are cosigned and presented to this court by Connecticut counsel, who assume full responsibility for their contents, and argument is presented subject to the presence and responsibility of Connecticut counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s application to permit Attorney J. Francis Hayden of the New York bar to appear pro hac vice is granted to the extent that Attorney Hayden is granted permission to participate in writing briefs and presenting argument in this court in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County, provided that all briefs are cosigned and presented to this court by Connecticut counsel, who assume full responsibility for their contents, and argument is presented subject to the presence and responsibility of Connecticut counsel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

344 A.2d 359, 169 Conn. 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willametz-v-goldfeld-conn-1975.