Willadsen v. Willadsen
This text of 198 S.E.2d 318 (Willadsen v. Willadsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal from the grant of a divorce is without merit.
The trial judge heard the case without a jury. His judgment does not disclose any details of the evidence adduced or what rulings were made in respect thereto. The appeal is unaccompanied by a transcript of the proceedings or an acceptable substitute and none appears to be available. The only errors argued and insisted upon, a ruling on the admissibility of testimony and the refusal to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, necessarily require a consideration of what transpired at the trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 S.E.2d 318, 230 Ga. 607, 1973 Ga. LEXIS 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willadsen-v-willadsen-ga-1973.