Willadsen v. Willadsen

198 S.E.2d 318, 230 Ga. 607, 1973 Ga. LEXIS 1001
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 10, 1973·No. 27867·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Jordan, Justice.

This appeal from the grant of a divorce is without merit.

The trial judge heard the case without a jury. His judgment does not disclose any details of the evidence adduced or what rulings were made in respect thereto. The appeal is unaccompanied by a transcript of the proceedings or an acceptable substitute and none appears to be available. The only errors argued and insisted upon, a ruling on the admissibility of testimony and the refusal to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, necessarily require a consideration of what transpired at the trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willadsen v. Willadsen, 198 S.E.2d 318, 230 Ga. 607, 1973 Ga. LEXIS 1001 (Ga. 1973).

198 S.E.2d 318 (Willadsen v. Willadsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Purcell v. Purcell
292 S.E.2d 721 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)
Cameron v. Cox
291 S.E.2d 115 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Griffin v. Griffin
238 S.E.2d 380 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Herring v. Herring
216 S.E.2d 642 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)